CT SOP version 2.0
Main changes from version 1.0: Updated SOP based on EMAs revised Guideline on quality, non-clinical and clinical requirements for investigational advanced therapy medicinal products in clinical trials, dated 20-JAN-2025, and came into effect from 01-JUL-2025.
CT SOP version no 1.0.
Main change from SOP no. LM 1.3. Adapted to the clinical trial regulation no 536/2014 including changes required by European Commission Guidelines on Good Clinical Practice (GCP) specific for advanced therapy medicinal products. Main changes concern documentation of quality of the ATMP, long-term follow-up and what to include in the informed consent document.
The sponsor has overall responsibility for ensuring that clinical trials of advanced therapy medicinal products are performed in compliance with this SOP.
The sponsor’s responsibilities shall be described in the quality system of the sponsor institution. Tasks are delegated according to SOP Roles and Responsibilities in clinical trials implemented in the institution.
The sponsor may transfer any or all of the sponsor's trial-related duties and functions to a service provider such as a Contract Research Organization (CRO), but the ultimate responsibility for the quality and integrity of the trial data always resides with the sponsor. The sponsor should ensure oversight of any trial-related duties and functions carried out on its behalf. Transfer of duties shall be specified in a written agreement.
The coordinating investigator should ensure that the protocol and informed consent document is adapted to ATMPs, that the ATMPs are stored and traced correctly, and that the documentation is stored for the appropriate number of years.
The third version of EMAs Guideline on quality, non-clinical and clinical requirements for investigational advanced therapy medicinal products in clinical trials was recently published and will come into effect from 01-JUL-2025. The guideline mainly provides instructions for manufacturing of ATMP and documentation of quality, but also contains usefull elements for the risk assessment (section 6 and 7).
For trials involving Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) different regulations may apply depending on origin, use, approval status, combination with other substances or devices, etc. EMA's websites Advanced therapy medicinal products: Overview and Guidelines relevant for advanced therapy medicinal products provides an oversight on ATMP development, and a comprehensive list of relevant guidelines for applicants for advanced therapy medicinal products.
ATMP for academia and non-profit organisations
Researchers involved in developing promising medicines may approach the EMA academic office (academia@ema.europa.eu). The academic office can, e.g. organise an academic briefing meeting with researchers, arrange a meeting with the EMA Innovation Task Force (Innovation Task Force) or support via EMA scientific advice (Scientific Advice) for protocol assistance.
European Medicines agency (EMA) Committee for Advanced Therapies
The coordinating investigator should consider contacting the EMA Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT):
To submit an application for ATMP classification, complete the two folloing forms:
Return both forms to atmpclassification@ema.europa.eu
The information which should be provided includes:
Scientific evaluation and certification
The coordinating investigator should consider submitting all relevant quality and, where available, non-clinical data to EMA for scientific evaluation and certification of a new ATMP.
Information which could be submitted with the request form includes but is not limited to:
Further information and the ATMP certification forms can be found on the EMA web site.
Quality of the ATMPs
The coordinating investigator should ensure that the following information is available:
If the handling process is complex, the coordinating investigator should ensure that adequate training is given by qualified personnel e.g. the manufacturer.
Manufacturing of investigational ATMPs is laid down in the GMP requirements for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (EudraLex - Volume 4 - European Commission).
Where an ATMP contains human cells or tissues, the Investigational medicinal product dossier (IMPD) should contain an overview of:
In case that an ATMP incorporates a medical device (“combined ATMP” and medical devices that are otherwise an integral part of the investigational ATMP, e.g. scaffolds), the IMPD should contain:
More details on content of the IMPD is provided in EU Reg 536/2014 Annex I, section G.
Where applicable, the cover letter should contain a list of medical devices which are to be investigated in the clinical trial, but which are not part of the investigational medicinal product or products, including the CE-marked medical devices for the intended use.
Traceability
The manufacturer should provide the coordinating investigator with detailed instructions to ensure traceability from sourcing, manufacturing, packaging, storing, transport to delivery to the clinical trial site, of the cells/tissues contained in the investigational ATMP.
Sponsor must document administration to the participants, reconciliation and destruction or final disposition. Traceability data should be documented in each step, as well as the location of the traceability records.
In case the manufacturer ceases to exist, the coordinating investigator should discuss custody of the traceability data with the Reference Member State (RMS).
Protocol
In addition to the usual requirements for a clinical trial protocol, the following should be considered by the coordinating investigator in relation to the content of the protocol but not limited to:
If medical devices are to be investigated in the clinical trial but are not part of the IMP, the protocol should contain summary information on the characteristics, performance and intended use of the device, as well as its regulatory status (e.g. CE-marked).
Informed consent
In addition to the usual requirement for consent the participants should receive the following information:
If presence of the sponsor (or a representative thereof) is envisaged before the start of the clinical trial, this should be explained in the informed consent. If, exceptionally, the presence of the sponsor (or a representative thereof) has not been foreseen from the outset of the clinical trial but is justified for reasons related to the protection of the clinical trial participants or to detect and prevent errors in the extraction of cells/tissues and/or administration, the clinical trial participants should be informed a posteriori.
Safety reporting
In addition to the usual reporting requirements for adverse events and serious adverse events from principal investigator to the sponsor (medical monitor), the following safety issues should be specifically considered (non-exhaustive list):
The process for reporting adverse events should be outlined clearly in the protocol.
Follow-up
The sponsor should ensure follow-up procedures including (non-exhaustive):
Where long-term follow-up of participants is necessary, the coordinating investigator should discuss the long-term follow-up with the reference member state. The length of the observation period should be based on a risk-assessment.
Patient alert cards
Alert cards should contain – as a minimum – the name of the participant, an investigator contact number and information regarding the medical treatment received.
The cards should be approved by authorities through CTIS.
Monitoring
In addition to usual risk considerations, the monitoring plan should consider that:
Documentation and archiving
After termination of the trial, the coordinating investigator and the principal investigators will archive all essential documentation and ensured storage for 30 years after the expiry date of the product, unless a longer time period is required in the clinical trial authorisation.
External references